question
stringlengths 235
464k
| answer
stringlengths 11
2.11k
|
|---|---|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs: line 43: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs (%pre]: [The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.]
|
Issue: The `%generate_buildrequires` is not available on EPEL8. It was introduced in Fedora 31 and therefore will be available only in EPEL9 and higher.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Resolution: Stop using dynamic `BuildRequires` for EPEL8 and lower. Instead, define all `BuildRequires` manually.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ %generate_buildrequires
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs: line 43: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxlaKs (%pre
|
The error message is very cryptic but `fg: no job control` usually means that an RPM macro is not defined.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
'/bin/sh' ./howto/howto-index.sh howto/coordinate-embargoed-releases.adoc howto/keep-canonical-history-correct.adoc howto/maintain-git.adoc howto/new-command.adoc howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.adoc howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-object-harder.adoc howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.adoc howto/revert-branch-rebase.adoc howto/separating-topic-branches.adoc howto/setup-git-server-over-http.adoc howto/update-hook-example.adoc howto/use-git-daemon.adoc howto/using-merge-subtree.adoc howto/using-signed-tag-in-pull-request.adoc >howto-index.adoc
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
make: *** [Makefile:2930: doc] Error 2]: [This snippet shows that the build has failed when trying to generate documentation.]
|
Issue: The build has failed because we were unable to generate a documentation. Most likely due to missing or incorrect build requires
Resolution: Add the correct build requires for generating documentation.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
make[1]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
'/bin/sh' ./howto/howto-index.sh howto/coordinate-embargoed-releases.adoc howto/keep-canonical-history-correct.adoc howto/maintain-git.adoc howto/new-command.adoc howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.adoc howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.adoc howto/recover-corrupted-object-harder.adoc howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.adoc howto/revert-branch-rebase.adoc howto/separating-topic-branches.adoc howto/setup-git-server-over-http.adoc howto/update-hook-example.adoc howto/use-git-daemon.adoc howto/using-merge-subtree.adoc howto/using-signed-tag-in-pull-request.adoc >howto-index.adoc
make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/git-2.49.0-build/git-2.49.0/Documentation'
make: *** [Makefile:2930: doc] Error 2
|
This snippet shows that the build has failed when trying to generate documentation.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0]: [This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile]
|
Issue: The SRPM build submitted by Packit failed because there was no Source0 field in spec file.
Resolution: Specify Source0 in specfile
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: No source number 0
|
This line says while parsing specfile, no Source0 was found in that specfile
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ CC=clang]: [The default C compiler has been set to clang.]
=============
[+ CXX=clang++]: [The default C++ compiler has been set to clang++]
=============
[ocamlfind mklib -o mlnbd \
-package unix -I . -I . \
-ldopt '-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1 ' \
libnbdocaml_a-nbd-c.o libnbdocaml_a-buffer.o libnbdocaml_a-handle.o libnbdocaml_a-helpers.o NBD.cmo \
-L../lib/.libs -lnbd]: [The ocaml compiler is being used.]
=============
[gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfgâ
]: [This is the error that causes the build to fail.]
|
Issue: The ocaml package has been built with gcc, so it uses gcc as its linker driver. However, since the default compiler for this RPM build has been set to clang. gcc is being passed flags that are meant for clang and that it does not support.
Resolution: Rebuild the ocaml package with clang and then rebuild this package.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ CC=clang
|
The default C compiler has been set to clang.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ CXX=clang++
|
The default C++ compiler has been set to clang++
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ocamlfind mklib -o mlnbd \
-package unix -I . -I . \
-ldopt '-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now --config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfg -flto=thin -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,--build-id=sha1 ' \
libnbdocaml_a-nbd-c.o libnbdocaml_a-buffer.o libnbdocaml_a-handle.o libnbdocaml_a-helpers.o NBD.cmo \
-L../lib/.libs -lnbd
|
The ocaml compiler is being used.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option â--config=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-clang-ld.cfgâ
|
This is the error that causes the build to fail.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd]: [There were installed but unpackaged files found.]
|
Issue: The build failed because there were some files that were installed during the build but unpackaged. Either the file was not ignored in the %files section of the spec file or the file was not added in the %files section to be packaged.
Resolution: Update the %files section of the spec file to accommodate all the files created during the build process by either ignoring them or including them to be packaged or updating the %install part of the spec file to get rid of unwanted files.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
|
There were installed but unpackaged files found.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/qmlcompiler/qqmljsstorageinitializer.cpp.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/CMakeLists.txt.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/enumproblems.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/unknownUnderlyingType.qml.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/tst_qmlcppcodegen.cpp.rej]: [It's the build step that caused the build to fail.]
|
Issue: It failed to apply the patch during the build and failed.
Resolution: You have to either drop the patch in case it's already part of the release or rebase the patch to make sure it applies cleanly.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch -f
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/qmlcompiler/qqmljsstorageinitializer.cpp.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/CMakeLists.txt.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/enumproblems.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/data/unknownUnderlyingType.qml.rej
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tests/auto/qml/qmlcppcodegen/tst_qmlcppcodegen.cpp.rej
|
It's the build step that caused the build to fail.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error: Transaction test error:
file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.8.1-1.fc42.s390x conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.22.0-1.fc40.noarch
]: [File from one of the installed packages conflicts with file already present on the build system.]
|
Issue: File `/etc/dnf/dnf.conf`, which is provided by libdnf5 package, is also tracked as being provided by already installed `dnf-data` package. This causes irreconcilable conflict, leading to build failure.
Resolution: Ensure that no requested package conflicts with an already installed package. This will require manual revision of package dependencies.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.2.8.1-1.fc42.s390x conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.22.0-1.fc40.noarch
|
File from one of the installed packages conflicts with file already present on the build system.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE20}': No such file or directory]: [shows wrong source file number]
|
Issue: the source file has wrong number
Resolution: check the source with the number exists
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
install: cannot stat '%{SOURCE20}': No such file or directory
|
shows wrong source file number
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
| ]: [Error report due to incorrect C code.]
|
Issue: Extra parenthesis in function definition.
Resolution: Enclose the function definition with correct number of parentheses.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
misc.c:61:98: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘)’ token
61 | _PROTOTYPE(static int doinchild,(int (*fn)(char *, char *, int), char *fp, char *rbuf, int rbln)));
|
|
Error report due to incorrect C code.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[test cert::test::v6_minimal_cert ... FAILED]: [Test marked as FAILED in the test suite summary.]
=============
[failures:
---- cert::test::v6_minimal_cert stdout ----
thread 'cert::test::v6_minimal_cert' panicked at /usr/share/cargo/registry/argon2-0.5.3/src/lib.rs:230:26:
capacity overflow
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
cert::test::v6_minimal_cert]: [Detailed output for the failed test.]
|
Issue: A test failure in the "cert::test::v6_minimal_cert" test.
Resolution: Fix the failing test :)
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
test cert::test::v6_minimal_cert ... FAILED
|
Test marked as FAILED in the test suite summary.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
failures:
---- cert::test::v6_minimal_cert stdout ----
thread 'cert::test::v6_minimal_cert' panicked at /usr/share/cargo/registry/argon2-0.5.3/src/lib.rs:230:26:
capacity overflow
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
cert::test::v6_minimal_cert
|
Detailed output for the failed test.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
DEBUG: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory]: [`/builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` file was not found because it doesn't exist. Because it is located in the `/builddir/build/SOURCES` directory, this is one of the source files.]
|
Issue: pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz source file was not found.
Resolution: Make sure the file exists locally, or upload it to the build system - in Fedora, this is the lookaside cache, use `fedkpg upload pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` and don't forget to commit the changes in the SOURCES file in dist-git.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG: error: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
DEBUG: Bad file: /builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz: No such file or directory
|
`/builddir/build/SOURCES/pycurl-7.45.3.tar.gz` file was not found because it doesn't exist. Because it is located in the `/builddir/build/SOURCES` directory, this is one of the source files.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ mv /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2 devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1HZv08 (%install)]: [This is a build error]
|
Issue: The build process is trying to move directory that doesn't exist.
Resolution: The build command should be fixed so it points to directory that does exist or it should be removed all together.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ mv /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2 devel-docs
mv: cannot stat '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-3.0.2-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/gimp-3.0.2': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1HZv08 (%install)
|
This is a build error
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[CC=clang]: [clang is being used as the C compiler.]
=============
[CXX=clang++]: [clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.]
=============
[checking whether the Fortran compiler works... no
configure: error: in '/builddir/build/BUILD/arpack-3.9.1-build/arpack-3.9.1/src':
configure: error: Fortran compiler cannot create executables
See 'config.log' for more details]: [This is the error message produced by the configuration script which has failed.]
|
Issue: The configure script failed because it is trying to use clang C/C++ flags with the gfortran compiler. gfortran does not support all clang flags so the fortran detection fails.
Resolution: This needs to be fixed in Fedora redhat-rpm-config: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/250
You can work around this be manually specifying the FORTRAN flangs and ensure they are compatible with gfortran.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CC=clang
|
clang is being used as the C compiler.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CXX=clang++
|
clang++ is being used as the C++ compiler.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
checking whether the Fortran compiler works... no
configure: error: in '/builddir/build/BUILD/arpack-3.9.1-build/arpack-3.9.1/src':
configure: error: Fortran compiler cannot create executables
See 'config.log' for more details
|
This is the error message produced by the configuration script which has failed.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar]: [It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) p
ackage.
]
|
Issue: Some of the required packages were not installed.
Resolution: Resolve the conflict first.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf from install of libdnf5-5.1.12-1.fc40.aarch64 conflicts with file from package dnf-data-4.19.0-1.fc40.noar
|
It's not possible to install all the required packages because there's a file conflict between a newly installed (libdnf5) and an already installed (dnf-data) p
ackage.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[go: command not found]: [This is an error that a binary called 'go' wasn't found in the system.]
|
Issue: The 'go' command was required to build the source code, but wasn't present in the build environment.
Resolution: Ensure that 'go' is installed in the build environment. This usually means identifying the package that includes this command, and specifying it as a build requirement in the spec file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
go: command not found
|
This is an error that a binary called 'go' wasn't found in the system.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/libsecret-0.21.7/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Child return code was: 1]: [Meson complains about a missing required dependency: bash-completion]
|
Issue: The build failed because the build system fails to find a required dependency: bash-completion
Resolution: Add "BuildRequires: bash-completion" to the spec file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Run-time dependency bash-completion found: NO (tried pkgconfig)
bash-completion/meson.build:3:13: ERROR: Dependency "bash-completion" not found, tried pkgconfig
A full log can be found at /builddir/build/BUILD/libsecret-0.21.7/redhat-linux-build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Unl02f (%build)
Child return code was: 1
|
Meson complains about a missing required dependency: bash-completion
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[CMake Error at scripts/CMakeLists.txt:415 (MESSAGE):]: [Header of the CMake error message]
=============
[Can not find mariadb.tmpfiles.d.sh or mariadb.tmpfiles.d.in in
/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/mariadb-10.11.11/scripts]: [CMake error description]
|
Issue: the CMake file call file that does not exist
Resolution: make sure the file in question exists or the CMake configuration is patched so it won't need it.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Error at scripts/CMakeLists.txt:415 (MESSAGE):
|
Header of the CMake error message
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Can not find mariadb.tmpfiles.d.sh or mariadb.tmpfiles.d.in in
/builddir/build/BUILD/mariadb10.11-10.11.11-build/mariadb-10.11.11/scripts
|
CMake error description
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../bin:/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.]: [Libtool tried to use paths for different environment (either architecture or system) than build target should be.]
=============
[../../backends/markup-tree.c: In function 'load_subdirs':
../../backends/markup-tree.c:698:29: error: passing argument 2 of 'g_stat' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
698 | if (g_stat (fullpath, &statbuf) < 0)
| ^~~~~~~~
| |
| struct stat *
In file included from ../../gconf/gconf-internals.h:33:
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h:141:31: note: expected 'GStatBuf *' {aka 'struct _stat32 *'} but argument is of type 'struct stat *'
141 | GStatBuf *buf);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~]: [A function is called with incompatible argument pointer type. It expected _stat32 but stat was used.]
|
Issue: Because incompatible types has been used. Besides of that probably build has been configured for different target system (architecture or system).
Resolution: Inspect the build configuration files and correct target environment (architecture or system) include path, defined macros and compile flags.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
libtool: error: Could not determine the host path corresponding to
libtool: error: '/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/../../bin:/builddir/build/BUILD/mingw-GConf2-3.2.6-build/GConf-3.2.6/build_win32/gconf/.libs:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib:/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin'
libtool: error: Continuing, but uninstalled executables may not work.
|
Libtool tried to use paths for different environment (either architecture or system) than build target should be.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
../../backends/markup-tree.c: In function 'load_subdirs':
../../backends/markup-tree.c:698:29: error: passing argument 2 of 'g_stat' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
698 | if (g_stat (fullpath, &statbuf) < 0)
| ^~~~~~~~
| |
| struct stat *
In file included from ../../gconf/gconf-internals.h:33:
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h:141:31: note: expected 'GStatBuf *' {aka 'struct _stat32 *'} but argument is of type 'struct stat *'
141 | GStatBuf *buf);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
|
A function is called with incompatible argument pointer type. It expected _stat32 but stat was used.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory]: [GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation.]
=============
[collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status]: [GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`.]
=============
[make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1]: [Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error.]
=============
[make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored)]: [Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored.]
=============
[mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory]: [Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found.]
=============
[RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build)]: [General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors.]
|
Issue: Library `jack` required for build was not found by linker.
Resolution: Ensure that all build time dependencies are available on the machine used for build.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljack: No such file or directory
|
GNU linker `/usr/bin/ld` can not find library `jack`. This will cause issues with compilation.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
|
GNU linker `ld` has failed with status `1`.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
make[1]: *** [makefile.qt-jack:480: miniAudicle] Error 1
|
Line `480` of `makefile.qt-jack` has been executed with an error.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
make: [makefile:53: linux-jack] Error 2 (ignored)
|
Line `53` of makefile for linux-jack has been executed with error. The error was ignored.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
mv: cannot stat 'miniAudicle': No such file or directory
|
Program `mv` for moving directories and files, has failed with `miniAudicle` argument. No file or directory `miniAudicle` was found.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zYxGaU (%build)
|
General message, indicating that RPM build has experienced errors.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE
RPM build errors:
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE]: [Error denoting missing file with license]
|
Issue: Missing license file
Resolution: Set correct `%license` in the specfile
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE
RPM build errors:
File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-koji-fedoramessaging-messages-1.2.5-1.20250310105343640705.pr194.76.g7aec4a2.fc40.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/python3-koji-fedoramessaging-messages/LICENSE
|
Error denoting missing file with license
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8
]: [Package policycoreutils-devel in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.]
=============
[No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8
]: [Package checkpolicy in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
]: [The DNF transaction has failed because some package dependencies can't be satisfied or requested packages are not available.]
|
Issue: The DNF transaction is requesting packages which can't be installed from the available repositories.
Resolution: Please make sure all your dependencies are available during the DNF transaction. Also make sure that your package dependencies are correct in the spec file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No match for argument: policycoreutils-devel >= 3.8
|
Package policycoreutils-devel in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No match for argument: checkpolicy >= 3.8
|
Package checkpolicy in version of 3.8 and greater is not available in the current repositories.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
|
The DNF transaction has failed because some package dependencies can't be satisfied or requested packages are not available.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [ BEGIN ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1716242'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)]: [Malfunctioning tmux]
|
Issue: This is a known issue where the tmux tool core-dumps.
Resolution: Please ask tmux maintainers to fix the tool in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80294
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [ BEGIN ] :: Get a screenshot :: actually running 'tmux capture-pane -J -p -t bz1716242'
server exited unexpectedly
:: [ 20:26:17 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: Get a screenshot (Expected 0, got 1)
|
Malfunctioning tmux
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ cp -p /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html
cp: cannot create regular file 'objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html': No such file or directory
]: [Build failure reason.]
|
Issue: Build process is trying to copy a file from location which doesn't exist.
Resolution: Make sure to add valid macros to your cp command to copy file from BUILDROOT folder instead of system root folder. If the file is not available nor generated, remove this reference from the .spec file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ cp -p /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html
cp: cannot create regular file 'objdir/dist/bin/browser/chrome/browser/content/browser/default-bookmarks.html': No such file or directory
|
Build failure reason.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(apkinspector)]: [The dependency transaction was not resolved.]
|
Issue: The python3dist(apkinspector) dependency was not found.
Resolution: Provide the python3dist(apkinspector) dependency for proper build.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(apkinspector)
|
The dependency transaction was not resolved.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glfw-3.4-3.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/GLFW]: [It lists the directory which is supposed to be installed but was not found after the installation.]
|
Issue: A directory /usr/share/doc/GLFW was supposed to be installed according to the spec file, but it does not exist.
Resolution: Make sure the doc directory is installed properly. In this case, the CMake configuration of the docs has to be adjusted.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glfw-3.4-3.el9.x86_64/usr/share/doc/GLFW
|
It lists the directory which is supposed to be installed but was not found after the installation.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat]: [Module 'path' does not exist.]
|
Issue: Module 'path' isn't available.
Resolution: Make sure you install the module, or ensure you are importing a submodule from a correct module.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pat
|
Module 'path' does not exist.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[29% tests passed, 24 tests failed out of 34
Total Test time (real) = 2.32 sec
The following tests FAILED:
3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
11 - count_triplets (Failed)
12 - count_twins (Failed)
16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)
%source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
%changelog entries must start with *
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)]: [Summary of failed tests.]
|
Issue: The build failed in the %check phase due to failing tests.
Resolution: Check the code and tests for possible regressions.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
29% tests passed, 24 tests failed out of 34
Total Test time (real) = 2.32 sec
The following tests FAILED:
3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
11 - count_triplets (Failed)
12 - count_twins (Failed)
16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)
%source_date_epoch_from_changelog is set, but %changelog has no entries to take a date from
%changelog entries must start with *
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zMEVHN (%check)
|
Summary of failed tests.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[The following tests FAILED:
3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
11 - count_triplets (Failed)
12 - count_twins (Failed)
16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest]: [The list of all failed CTest test cases.]
|
Issue: The CTest testsuite of the given package failed.
Resolution: Try to analyze and fix the failed test cases, if possible. Alternatively, discuss the failed test cases with upstream.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
The following tests FAILED:
3 - clear_primesieve_iterator1 (Failed)
4 - clear_primesieve_iterator2 (Failed)
5 - count_primes1 (Failed)
6 - count_primes2 (Failed)
7 - count_primes3 (Failed)
8 - count_quadruplets (Failed)
9 - count_quintuplets (Failed)
10 - count_sextuplets (Failed)
11 - count_triplets (Failed)
12 - count_twins (Failed)
16 - generate_n_primes1 (Failed)
17 - generate_n_primes2 (Failed)
18 - generate_primes1 (Failed)
19 - generate_primes2 (Failed)
23 - move_primesieve_iterator (Failed)
24 - next_prime1 (Failed)
25 - next_prime2 (Failed)
26 - nth_prime1 (Failed)
27 - nth_prime2 (Failed)
28 - nth_prime3 (Failed)
30 - prev_prime1 (Failed)
31 - prev_prime2 (Failed)
32 - skipto_next_prime (Failed)
33 - skipto_prev_prime (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
|
The list of all failed CTest test cases.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[RPM build errors:
File not found: /tmp/tmp.eXRvpwJs1z/BUILDROOT/ansible-pcp-2.4.1-1.el10.x86_64/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat
]: [Fail of ansible-pcp rebuild]
|
Issue: A missing file in ansible-pcp SRPM
Resolution: Ensure the /usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat file is present in the SRPM tar ball
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
RPM build errors:
File not found: /tmp/tmp.eXRvpwJs1z/BUILDROOT/ansible-pcp-2.4.1-1.el10.x86_64/usr/share/ansible/collections/ansible_collections/redhat
|
Fail of ansible-pcp rebuild
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[:: [ 07:54:07 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: File 'show-bgp-neighbors.log' should contain 'BGP state = Idle'
]: [Checking the state of BGP failed.]
|
Issue: BGP state was not identified as "Idle".
Resolution: In this use case, also the "Active" is the correct one, so it can be either "Idle" or "Active"
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
:: [ 07:54:07 ] :: [ FAIL ] :: File 'show-bgp-neighbors.log' should contain 'BGP state = Idle'
|
Checking the state of BGP failed.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-analyzer-1.6.0-build/glsl_analyzer-1.6.0/build.zig:130:53: error: root struct of file 'Build.Step' has no member named 'MakeOptions']: [Zig compiler error message about non-existing struct member.]
|
Issue: The zig build script references non-existing struct member of a struct originating from the Zig standard library.
Resolution: The build script is most likely written for a different version of Zig. See the upstream page about used zig version.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/glsl-analyzer-1.6.0-build/glsl_analyzer-1.6.0/build.zig:130:53: error: root struct of file 'Build.Step' has no member named 'MakeOptions'
|
Zig compiler error message about non-existing struct member.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit) needed by cmake-4.0.0~rc4-1.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
]: [This indicates the problem.]
|
Issue: The build is failing because there is no package that provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit).
Resolution: Use
dnf repoquery --whatprovides 'libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit)'
to find out which RPM provides the library and either install it or add it as a BuildRequires to your spec file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit) needed by cmake-4.0.0~rc4-1.fc42.x86_64 from copr_base
|
This indicates the problem.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
['srpm_build_method': 'rpkg',]: [This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`.]
=============
[{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard]: [But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one). This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg.]
|
Issue: Improperly picked source method.
Resolution: Start using the DistGit method for building your SRPMs. https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#dist-git-method
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
'srpm_build_method': 'rpkg',
|
This seems like a build with `rpkg-util`.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
{'clone_url': 'https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Guard
|
But `clone_url` points at Fedora DistGit (the official one). This seems wrong, you would typically use the DistGit source method instead of rpkg.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Could not resolve dependencies for project]: [indicates that project dependency resolution failed]
=============
[has not been downloaded from it before]: [indicates that maven artifact is missing]
|
Issue: maven build failed due to a missing build dependency
Resolution: add missing dependency as build requires
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Could not resolve dependencies for project
|
indicates that project dependency resolution failed
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
has not been downloaded from it before
|
indicates that maven artifact is missing
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.13'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-applehelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-jsmath)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-qthelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml) >= 1.1.5'
Not all dependencies satisfie]: [Many dependecies not met]
|
Issue: Dependencies not found or not existing in used repositories
Resolution: Add repositories that ship the package or check the name of the packages
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(pygments) >= 2.13'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(snowballstemmer) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-applehelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp) >= 2'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-jsmath)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-qthelp)'
No matching package to install: 'python3.11dist(sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml) >= 1.1.5'
Not all dependencies satisfie
|
Many dependecies not met
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer]: [Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` used by `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` was undefined. ]
=============
[[2024-11-28 14:05:55,886][ ERROR][PID:3061771] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure]: [No success file was found, indicating a build failure.]
|
Issue: Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` was undefined. This indicates that the build system lacks some sort of dependency that the `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` binary was built against.
The `g_once_init_enter_pointer` symbol originates from glib2 library.
Resolution: Ensure that appropriate version of the glib2 library must be present during build, `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` has a build dependency on it.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_pointer
|
Symbol `g_once_init_enter_pointer` used by `/lib64/libdnf.so.2` was undefined.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
[2024-11-28 14:05:55,886][ ERROR][PID:3061771] Build failed: Backend process error: No success file => build failure
|
No success file was found, indicating a build failure.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1]: [The build failed in `%build` phase.]
=============
[CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.]: [CMake cannot prepare the build environment.]
=============
[CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.]: [You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.]
|
Issue: The build failed in `%build` phase becase CMake was missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.
Resolution: You should add build dependency to your spec file:
BuildRequires: qt6-qtbase-private-devel
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yAXiQF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
|
The build failed in `%build` phase.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.
|
CMake cannot prepare the build environment.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.
CMake Error in CMakeLists.txt:
Imported target "Qt6::QmlPrivate" includes non-existent path
"/usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.8.0"
in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. Possible reasons include:
* The path was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and references files it does not
provide.
|
You are missing devel files for qt6-qtbase-private.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
]: [RPM transaction has failed.]
=============
[Problem 1: package tcl-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
- package python3.9-3.9.21-1.fc42.ppc64le from fedora requires libtcl8.6.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests]: [Seems that the tcl-devel package requires tcl package of version tcl-1:9.0.0-1, however, this version can't be installed together with tcl-1:8.6.15-6 which is already requested.]
=============
[Problem 2: package tk-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tk = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
- package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires libtcl9.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
- package tix-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tcl(abi) = 8.6, but none of the providers can be installed
- package tix-devel-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tix = 1:8.4.3-41.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests]: [The RPM transaction has a conflicting requests.
The tk-devel package requires the tk package in version 1:9.0.0-1 which is not available.
The tix package requires tcl(abi) = 8.6 which is not available.]
|
Issue: The RPM transaction contains requirements which can't be satisfied. Some packages are missing or are not available in the required version.
Resolution: Please make sure the spec file dependencies are correctly set and that these dependent packages are available during the build.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
|
RPM transaction has failed.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem 1: package tcl-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
- package python3.9-3.9.21-1.fc42.ppc64le from fedora requires libtcl8.6.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests
|
Seems that the tcl-devel package requires tcl package of version tcl-1:9.0.0-1, however, this version can't be installed together with tcl-1:8.6.15-6 which is already requested.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem 2: package tk-devel-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tk = 1:9.0.0-1.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
- package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires libtcl9.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package tk-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base requires tcl = 1:9.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tcl-1:9.0.0-1.fc42.ppc64le from copr_base and tcl-1:8.6.15-6.fc42.ppc64le from fedora
- package tix-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tcl(abi) = 8.6, but none of the providers can be installed
- package tix-devel-1:8.4.3-41.fc41.ppc64le from fedora requires tix = 1:8.4.3-41.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- conflicting requests
|
The RPM transaction has a conflicting requests.
The tk-devel package requires the tk package in version 1:9.0.0-1 which is not available.
The tix package requires tcl(abi) = 8.6 which is not available.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2]: [error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2]
|
Issue: Bad changelog format
Resolution: Fix the format.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2
|
error: bad date in %changelog: lun. janv. 10 2022 Robert-André Mauchin <[email protected]> 0.1.1-2
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.