question
stringlengths 235
464k
| answer
stringlengths 11
2.11k
|
|---|---|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CC=clang
|
clang has been selected as the default C compiler.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
CXX=clang++
|
clang++ has been selected as the default C++ compiler.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory]: [Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.
Name of the file appears to be a typo.]
=============
[INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
# bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec
]: [Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure.]
|
Issue: Name of file `account-serrver.conf-sample` contains a typo. Therefore it cannot be present at the expected location. Causing build to fail.
Resolution: Fix typo in the file name `account-serrver.conf-sample`.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG: install: cannot stat 'etc/account-serrver.conf-sample': No such file or directory
|
Expected file `etc/account-serrver.conf-sample` was not found in its expected location.
Name of the file appears to be a typo.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
INFO: EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
# bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -ba --noprep --target x86_64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/openstack-swift.spec
|
Error indicating failed mock build. It isn't actual cause of the issue, rather a stack trace of the build failure.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-krb/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(picky-krb/default) < 0.10.0~)
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(picky/x509) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky/x509) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/default) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/default) < 2.0.0~)
Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/v4) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/v4) < 2.0.0~)]: [Package manager reports issues with resolution of dependencies. 5 required packages were not found in installed repositories.]
|
Issue: Some of the dependencies were not available.
Resolution: All packages required for the successful build must be available in the installed repositories with appropriate versions. Check repositories for presence of required packages, adjusting constraints on versions as necessary.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(picky) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(picky-krb/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(picky-krb/default) < 0.10.0~)
Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(picky/x509) >= 7.0.0~rc.12 with crate(picky/x509) < 8.0.0~)
Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/default) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/default) < 2.0.0~)
Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(uuid/v4) >= 1.15.0 with crate(uuid/v4) < 2.0.0~)
|
Package manager reports issues with resolution of dependencies. 5 required packages were not found in installed repositories.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug
]: [Files /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite and /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug are not included in the final package.
]
|
Issue: The error message indicates that the RPM package installation process detected files that were installed on the system but were not included in the RPM package itself. This is a common issue in package maintenance.
Resolution: Missing Files: Ensure that all necessary files are included in the RPM package. This might involve adjusting the spec file section %files to include additional files or directories.
Incorrect File Permissions: Verify that the file permissions of the included files are correct. Incorrect permissions can prevent the RPM package manager from installing files properly.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/llvm-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug
|
Files /usr/bin/mlir-rewrite and /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mlir-rewrite-20.0.0~pre20241209.g1dfa34c8e1f289-3.fc40.aarch64.debug are not included in the final package.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[> [email protected] unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage
RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]: [> [email protected] unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage
RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)]
|
Issue: Unit tests for fastify from upstream github repository failed.
Resolution: Please check upstream repository and fix this issue in upstream as well. Also please do not forget to report this issue, in case it is not fixed yet.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
> [email protected] unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage
RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
|
> [email protected] unit
> borp --reporter=@jsumners/line-reporter --coverage --check-coverage
RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.concurrency" is out of range. It must be >= 1 && <= 4294967295. Received 0
at new Test (node:internal/test_runner/test:475:9)
at createTestTree (node:internal/test_runner/harness:82:16)
at run (node:internal/test_runner/runner:676:16)
at runWithTypeScript (file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/lib/run.js:237:12)
at async file:///opt/app-root/src/node_modules/borp/borp.js:150:18 {
code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
Test for image 'ubi10/nodejs-22:1' FAILED (exit code: 1)
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]
=============
[Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2]: [Reason why the package cannot be built]
|
Issue: Available version of `golang` in the repos doesn't satisfy the minimal requirements
Resolution: Evaluate whether the version requirement is needed, or package the appropriate version of the Go that satisfies the requirement.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2
|
Reason why the package cannot be built
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2
|
Reason why the package cannot be built
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
No match for argument: golang >= 1.23.2
|
Reason why the package cannot be built
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ubnxKR (%build)]: [the problem is in the build section ]
=============
[bannergrab.c:653:36: error: passing argument 2 of βsignalβ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
653 | signal(14, timeoutHandler);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(void)]: [Detailed description of the issue ]
=============
[error: passing argument 2 of βsignalβ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
679 | signal(14, timeoutHandler);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(void)]: [Detailed description of error]
|
Issue: There is an issue in the source code, probably the API of signal function has changed, so the input arguments must be adjusted
Resolution: Adjust the input arguments to be compatible with the new API. make downstream patch or contact upstream
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ubnxKR (%build)
|
the problem is in the build section
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
bannergrab.c:653:36: error: passing argument 2 of βsignalβ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
653 | signal(14, timeoutHandler);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(void)
|
Detailed description of the issue
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: passing argument 2 of βsignalβ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
679 | signal(14, timeoutHandler);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(void)
|
Detailed description of error
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[compress.c:618:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
618 | zero = 0;
| ^~~~
compress.c:618:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'zero' [-Wimplicit-int]]: [The build is failing due to a compiler error related to a implicit βintβ declaration.]
|
Issue: The build failed because of compiler reports the error about [-Wimplicit-int].
Resolution: Check the file, line, and variable reported in the compiler error for a missing type declaration. Add βintβ to this variable.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
compress.c:618:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
618 | zero = 0;
| ^~~~
compress.c:618:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'zero' [-Wimplicit-int]
|
The build is failing due to a compiler error related to a implicit βintβ declaration.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Running webpack...
make: *** [Makefile:924: public/assets/js/index.js] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
]: [Webpack failed as a part of make.]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3XOkK4 (%build)
]: [Failed on %build]
|
Issue: Problem is likely with mismatch of js modules/common js in webpack
Resolution: Try changing webpack's config file extension from .js to .mjs
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Running webpack...
make: *** [Makefile:924: public/assets/js/index.js] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Webpack failed as a part of make.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3XOkK4 (%build)
|
Failed on %build
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
checking whether the C compiler works... ]: [The ./configure commands looks for gcc and can't find it]
|
Issue: The gcc command is not available in the buildroot
Resolution: Edit the spec file and add a new buildtime dependency for gcc.
BuildRequires: gcc
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
checking whether the C compiler works...
|
The ./configure commands looks for gcc and can't find it
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Hhv7]: [The Executing(%check) is the section that fails. ]
=============
[/builddir/build/BUILD/webmock-3.18.1/usr/share/gems/gems/webmock-3.18.1/minitest/test_helper.rb:13:in `<top (required)>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)
test_class = defined?(MiniTest::Test) ? MiniTest::Test : MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
^^^^^^^^
Did you mean? Minitest
from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
from <internal:dir>:411:in `glob'
from -e:1:in `<main>']: [The compilation of a test file (because we are in the %check section) failed here, claiming that the `MiniTest` ruby package doesn't exist.]
|
Issue: The `MiniTest` ruby package is not available at the ruby compilation time.
Resolution: If the MiniTest package exists, you need to make it available on rubypath. If not, you need to provide the MiniTest package.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Hhv7
|
The Executing(%check) is the section that fails.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/webmock-3.18.1/usr/share/gems/gems/webmock-3.18.1/minitest/test_helper.rb:13:in `<top (required)>': uninitialized constant MiniTest (NameError)
test_class = defined?(MiniTest::Test) ? MiniTest::Test : MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
^^^^^^^^
Did you mean? Minitest
from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
from <internal:/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:127:in `require'
from <internal:dir>:411:in `glob'
from -e:1:in `<main>'
|
The compilation of a test file (because we are in the %check section) failed here, claiming that the `MiniTest` ruby package doesn't exist.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ /builddir/build/SPECS/opentofu.spec line 42: autopatch: no matching patches in range]: [The relevant error message saying that the 'autopatch' rpm macro did not find any matching patches.]
|
Issue: The '%autopatch' rpm macro couldn't find any patches defined in the spec file.
Resolution: Either remove the '%autopatch' line from the specfile or switch to the '%autosetup' macro that provides added convenience.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/SPECS/opentofu.spec line 42: autopatch: no matching patches in range
|
The relevant error message saying that the 'autopatch' rpm macro did not find any matching patches.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error:
Problem: package libavfilter-free-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.5.3.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
- package opencv-text-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
- package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter-free = 7.0.2-10.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
- package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libopencv_text.so.410()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires opencv-text(x86-64) = 4.10.0-8.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
]: [There are conflicting dependencies for the package]
|
Issue: It wasn't possible to resolve the dependency chain as the dependencies collide with each other
Resolution: Resolve dependency chain and check that all of the required versions of each dependency are compatible with each other
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error:
Problem: package libavfilter-free-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.5.3.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from appstream and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
- package opencv-text-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libtesseract.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_gears6_25_04_0
- cannot install both tesseract-4.1.1-7.el9.x86_64 from https_download_rockylinux_org_pub_rocky_9_devel_x86_64_os and tesseract-5.3.4-6.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime
- package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter-free = 7.0.2-10.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
- package libavfilter-free-devel-7.0.2-10.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libavfilter.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
- package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires libopencv_text.so.410()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package opencv-devel-4.10.0-8.el9.x86_64 from copr_loise_plasma6_runtime requires opencv-text(x86-64) = 4.10.0-8.el9, but none of the providers can be installed
|
There are conflicting dependencies for the package
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[cp: cannot stat 'nmbl.spec': No such file or directory]: [File `nmbl.spec` couldn't be found at the expected location. Program `cp` couldn't be successfully executed.]
=============
[Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)]: [Traceback from execution of program written in Python. It indicates that a sub-process launched with specific arguments failed. The exception raised is meant to indicate that failure.]
|
Issue: File `nmbl.spec` was not at the expected location.
Resolution: Check presence of `nmbl.spec`in the build environment and ensure that it is present at the expected location, or change the expected location to match the actual location of the file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
cp: cannot stat 'nmbl.spec': No such file or directory
|
File `nmbl.spec` couldn't be found at the expected location. Program `cp` couldn't be successfully executed.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 115, in <module>
run_cmd(mock + ['--chroot', 'su - {0} -c {1}'.format(user, cmd)])
~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/bin/copr-sources-custom", line 64, in run_cmd
return subprocess.check_call(command, **kwargs)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py", line 419, in check_call
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
|
Traceback from execution of program written in Python. It indicates that a sub-process launched with specific arguments failed. The exception raised is meant to indicate that failure.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references ___________________
@pytest.mark.skipif(not hasattr(sys, "getrefcount"), reason="PyPy")
def test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references():
surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
v = memoryview(b"bla")
x = v[:1]
recfcount_v = sys.getrefcount(v)
recfcount_x = sys.getrefcount(x)
assert recfcount_v == recfcount_x
> surface.set_mime_data("foo", v)
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_api.py:282: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf ________________________
@pytest.mark.skipif(
sysconfig.get_platform().startswith("win"), reason="msvc fixme")
def test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf():
jpeg_bytes = zlib.decompress(base64.b64decode(
b'eJz7f+P/AwYBLzdPNwZGRkYGDyBk+H+bwRnEowj8P8TAzcHACDJHkOH/EQYRIBsV'
b'cP6/xcDBCBJlrLcHqRBAV8EAVcHIylSPVwGbPQEFjPaK9XDrBAipBSq4CQB9jiS0'
))
file_like = io.BytesIO()
surface = cairo.PDFSurface(file_like, 3, 3)
context = cairo.Context(surface)
image = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
> image.set_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG, jpeg_bytes)
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_api.py:308: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data ________________________
def test_surface_get_set_mime_data():
surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
assert surface.get_mime_data("foo") is None
assert surface.get_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG) is None
> surface.set_mime_data("foo", b"bar")
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_surface.py:478: SystemError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references - SystemE...
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf - SystemError: /buil...
FAILED tests/test_surface.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data - SystemError: /...
=================== 3 failed, 268 passed, 3 skipped in 0.82s ===================]: [it contains traceback from the Python test failures which lead to the failed build]
|
Issue: Tests calling set_mime_data on a cairo ImageSurface object failed. The method tries to perform an action that is not possible within the current Python object (bad argument to internal function).
Resolution: Report upstream and wait for the fix
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references ___________________
@pytest.mark.skipif(not hasattr(sys, "getrefcount"), reason="PyPy")
def test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references():
surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
v = memoryview(b"bla")
x = v[:1]
recfcount_v = sys.getrefcount(v)
recfcount_x = sys.getrefcount(x)
assert recfcount_v == recfcount_x
> surface.set_mime_data("foo", v)
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_api.py:282: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf ________________________
@pytest.mark.skipif(
sysconfig.get_platform().startswith("win"), reason="msvc fixme")
def test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf():
jpeg_bytes = zlib.decompress(base64.b64decode(
b'eJz7f+P/AwYBLzdPNwZGRkYGDyBk+H+bwRnEowj8P8TAzcHACDJHkOH/EQYRIBsV'
b'cP6/xcDBCBJlrLcHqRBAV8EAVcHIylSPVwGbPQEFjPaK9XDrBAipBSq4CQB9jiS0'
))
file_like = io.BytesIO()
surface = cairo.PDFSurface(file_like, 3, 3)
context = cairo.Context(surface)
image = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
> image.set_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG, jpeg_bytes)
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_api.py:308: SystemError
________________________ test_surface_get_set_mime_data ________________________
def test_surface_get_set_mime_data():
surface = cairo.ImageSurface(cairo.FORMAT_RGB24, 1, 1)
assert surface.get_mime_data("foo") is None
assert surface.get_mime_data(cairo.MIME_TYPE_JPEG) is None
> surface.set_mime_data("foo", b"bar")
E SystemError: /builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.13.0a5/Objects/abstract.c:430: bad argument to internal function
tests/test_surface.py:478: SystemError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data_references - SystemE...
FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_surface_mime_data_for_pdf - SystemError: /buil...
FAILED tests/test_surface.py::test_surface_get_set_mime_data - SystemError: /...
=================== 3 failed, 268 passed, 3 skipped in 0.82s ===================
|
it contains traceback from the Python test failures which lead to the failed build
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3/rdppm.c:427: undefined reference to `MAX'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
]: [Shows error from linker that caused the build failure]
=============
[rdppm.c: In function 'start_input_ppm':
rdppm.c:427:51: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAX' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
(size_t)(((long)MAX(maxval, 255) + 1L) *
^~~
]: [This is cause of the error - warning shows that function/macro used here is not defined]
|
Issue: Build failed because linker was not able to find required symbol. In this case its missing definition of MAX macro
Resolution: Add definition of required macro, either manually define it or include some header file that contains the definition.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
/builddir/build/BUILD/libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3/rdppm.c:427: undefined reference to `MAX'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
|
Shows error from linker that caused the build failure
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
rdppm.c: In function 'start_input_ppm':
rdppm.c:427:51: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAX' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
(size_t)(((long)MAX(maxval, 255) + 1L) *
^~~
|
This is cause of the error - warning shows that function/macro used here is not defined
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[checking for GNU M4 that supports accurate traces... configure: error: no acceptable m4 could be found in $PATH.]: [Check for acceptable GNU M4 macro processor has failed. This is a problem since M4 is used by autoconf.]
=============
[GNU M4 1.4.6 or later is required; 1.4.16 or newer is recommended.
GNU M4 1.4.15 uses a buggy replacement strstr on some systems.
Glibc 2.9 - 2.12 and GNU M4 1.4.11 - 1.4.15 have another strstr bug]: [Reasons are given for why various M4 versions are not acceptable.]
|
Issue: The M4 macro processor was present, but the version 1.4.13 is among those considered not acceptable.
Resolution: Ensure that acceptable version of M4 macro processor is present on the build system. Verify dependencies of the package.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
checking for GNU M4 that supports accurate traces... configure: error: no acceptable m4 could be found in $PATH.
|
Check for acceptable GNU M4 macro processor has failed. This is a problem since M4 is used by autoconf.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
GNU M4 1.4.6 or later is required; 1.4.16 or newer is recommended.
GNU M4 1.4.15 uses a buggy replacement strstr on some systems.
Glibc 2.9 - 2.12 and GNU M4 1.4.11 - 1.4.15 have another strstr bug
|
Reasons are given for why various M4 versions are not acceptable.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2 -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=z14 -mtune=z15 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection ' 'HOSTLDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ' ARCH=s390 KCFLAGS= WITH_GCOV=0 -j16 modules
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
from ./include/kunit/test.h:24,
from mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:10:
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:18: error: expected β,β or β;β before βEXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTINGβ
36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:26:61: note: in definition of macro β__MODULE_INFOβ
26 | = __MODULE_INFO_PREFIX __stringify(tag) "=" info
| ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:299:33: note: in expansion of macro βMODULE_INFOβ
299 | #define MODULE_IMPORT_NS(ns) MODULE_INFO(import_ns, ns)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:1: note: in expansion of macro βMODULE_IMPORT_NSβ
36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm/kasan] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-6.12.0-78.el10/linux-6.12.0-78.el10.s390x/Makefile:1984: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:236: __sub-make] Error 2
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)]: [This snippet has a compilation failure of the kernel.]
|
Issue: The mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c has a syntax error because the EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING should be covered by double quotes.
Resolution: To fix this issue, you need to fix the syntax error by putting EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING under double quotes.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ /usr/bin/make -s 'HOSTCFLAGS=-O2 -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=z14 -mtune=z15 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection ' 'HOSTLDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes ' ARCH=s390 KCFLAGS= WITH_GCOV=0 -j16 modules
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:22,
from ./include/kunit/test.h:24,
from mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:10:
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:18: error: expected β,β or β;β before βEXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTINGβ
36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:26:61: note: in definition of macro β__MODULE_INFOβ
26 | = __MODULE_INFO_PREFIX __stringify(tag) "=" info
| ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:299:33: note: in expansion of macro βMODULE_INFOβ
299 | #define MODULE_IMPORT_NS(ns) MODULE_INFO(import_ns, ns)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:36:1: note: in expansion of macro βMODULE_IMPORT_NSβ
36 | MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm/kasan] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: mm] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-6.12.0-78.el10/linux-6.12.0-78.el10.s390x/Makefile:1984: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:236: __sub-make] Error 2
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GiGHcq (%build)
|
This snippet has a compilation failure of the kernel.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ ipython_config = profile_dir / "ipython_config.py"
> assert Path(ipython_config).exists()
E AssertionError: assert False
E + where False = exists()
E + where exists = PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py').exists
E + where PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py') = Path(PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py'))
core/tests/test_profile.py:161: AssertionError]: [The assertion failed when trying to assert that the ipython_config.py file exists]
|
Issue: The assertion that the ipython_config.py file exists failed, it may be missing, named incorrectly or located in a wrong place.
Resolution: Ensure the ipython_config.py file exists, is named correctly and is located in the expected directory.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ipython_config = profile_dir / "ipython_config.py"
> assert Path(ipython_config).exists()
E AssertionError: assert False
E + where False = exists()
E + where exists = PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py').exists
E + where PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py') = Path(PosixPath('/tmp/tmpj26idsg9/profile_foo/ipython_config.py'))
core/tests/test_profile.py:161: AssertionError
|
The assertion failed when trying to assert that the ipython_config.py file exists
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kn1qkC (%check)
]: [The build failed in %check section.]
=============
[> raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
E FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'
/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py:1966: FileNotFoundError
]: [The command "git" could not be found.]
|
Issue: The test suite needs to run `git` command, but the package that provides this command is not installed.
Resolution: You need to add BuildRequires with package that provides this command.
In this case:
```
$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/git
git-core-2.47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
```
You should add to SPEC file:
BuildRequires: git-core
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kn1qkC (%check)
|
The build failed in %check section.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
> raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
E FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'
/usr/lib64/python3.13/subprocess.py:1966: FileNotFoundError
|
The command "git" could not be found.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Error: building at STEP "RUN rm -rf /etc/my.cnf.d/* && /usr/libexec/container-setup && rpm-file-permissions && /usr/libexec/mysqld -V | grep -qe "{$MYSQL_VERSION}\." && echo "Found VERSION ${MYSQL_VERSION}"": while running runtime: exit status 1
]: [Container build error, showing the precise command that failed]
=============
[{$MYSQL_VERSION}]: [The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}]
|
Issue: The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
Resolution: Fix the BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Error: building at STEP "RUN rm -rf /etc/my.cnf.d/* && /usr/libexec/container-setup && rpm-file-permissions && /usr/libexec/mysqld -V | grep -qe "{$MYSQL_VERSION}\." && echo "Found VERSION ${MYSQL_VERSION}"": while running runtime: exit status 1
|
Container build error, showing the precise command that failed
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
{$MYSQL_VERSION}
|
The error - typo in BASH variable
The code contains: {$MYSQL_VERSION}
But it should be: ${MYSQL_VERSION}
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of Γ’ΒΒload_entryΓ’ΒΒ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
145 | e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp);
| ^~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(const char *)
src/funcs.h:92:37: note: expected Γ’ΒΒvoid (*)(void)Γ’ΒΒ but argument is of type Γ’ΒΒvoid (*)(const char *)Γ’ΒΒ
92 | entry *load_entry(FILE *, void (*)(), struct passwd *, char **);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:747: src/user.o] Error 1]: [The error message indicates a type mismatch in the load_entry function call. This function expects a pointer to a function that takes no arguments (void pointer), but you're providing a pointer to a function that takes a const char * argument (a pointer to a constant character string).]
|
Issue: The build failure is primarily due to the use of deprecated security_context_t functions. This indicates that the cronie package is attempting to use older SELinux APIs that are no longer recommended.
Resolution: Additional Considerations
Security Implications: Using deprecated APIs can introduce security vulnerabilities. It's essential to assess the risks associated with the specific use case and take appropriate measures to mitigate them.
SELinux Configuration: Ensure that your SELinux policy is configured correctly to allow the necessary permissions for the cronie service. Incorrect SELinux policies can lead to unexpected behavior and security issues.
Build Environment Consistency: Verify that your build environment is configured correctly and that all necessary dependencies are installed. Inconsistent build environments can cause unexpected build failures.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
src/user.c:145:54: error: passing argument 2 of Γ’ΒΒload_entryΓ’ΒΒ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
145 | e = load_entry(file, log_error, pw, envp);
| ^~~~~~~~~
| |
| void (*)(const char *)
src/funcs.h:92:37: note: expected Γ’ΒΒvoid (*)(void)Γ’ΒΒ but argument is of type Γ’ΒΒvoid (*)(const char *)Γ’ΒΒ
92 | entry *load_entry(FILE *, void (*)(), struct passwd *, char **);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:747: src/user.o] Error 1
|
The error message indicates a type mismatch in the load_entry function call. This function expects a pointer to a function that takes no arguments (void pointer), but you're providing a pointer to a function that takes a const char * argument (a pointer to a constant character string).
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[308:41.93 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-45ab92441dac2f20.gkrust.25dc58529403c021-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17h954f74b0f4b6b6f4E.12427.rel'
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.41-56.el10 - out of date ?
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value]: [This is the error causing the build to fail.]
|
Issue: The build failed because of a bug (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141737) in llvm.
Resolution: Update llvm to version >= 20.1.7.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
308:41.93 /usr/bin/ld: ../../../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/libgkrust.a(gkrust-45ab92441dac2f20.gkrust.25dc58529403c021-cgu.0.rcgu.o): unrecognized relocation type 0x13b in section `.rodata..Lswitch.table._ZN14neqo_transport10connection10Connection10input_path17h954f74b0f4b6b6f4E.12427.rel'
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: is this version of the linker - version 2.41-56.el10 - out of date ?
308:42.00 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
|
This is the error causing the build to fail.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Failed to resolve the transaction:]: [The error type]
=============
[No match for argument: python3-mrtparse]: [The name of the missing package]
|
Issue: A package is missing in Fedora to build this one.
Resolution: You need to package the missing dependency first.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Failed to resolve the transaction:
|
The error type
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
No match for argument: python3-mrtparse
|
The name of the missing package
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: gimp-devel-tools
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0]: [This lists packages (build dependencies) which couldn't be installed]
|
Issue: Some packages which are build dependencies couldn't be installed, and therefore the source code couldn't be built.
Resolution: Look at the listed packages (in this case gimp-devel-tools and any packages that matches "pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0") and figure out why they can't be installed. They might be missing in the repository (perhaps just for some specific architecture). Or there can be a network failure which caused some repository to be unavailable. If this is not a temporary issue, you either need to drop the build dependencies (if the source code can be built without them), replace them with a compatible library (if available), or add the missing dependencies to the repository.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: gimp-devel-tools
DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: pkgconfig(gimp-3.0) >= 3.0
|
This lists packages (build dependencies) which couldn't be installed
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)
]: [The part "(python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)" specifies a very specific version range for the setuptools package. It requires a version that is at least 70.0.0 but strictly less than 70.1.0.]
|
Issue: The error message you're seeing, "nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)," indicates a dependency conflict within your Python project. Therefore the RPM build failed as the build requires can't be satisfied.
Resolution: Update the dependency constraint to the one available in the distribution and make sure the software works well with it.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)
|
The part "(python3dist(setuptools) >= 70 with python3dist(setuptools) < 70.1)" specifies a very specific version range for the setuptools package. It requires a version that is at least 70.0.0 but strictly less than 70.1.0.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[******************** TEST 'libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 13
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/clang -fopenmp -gdwarf-4 -O1 -fsanitize=thread -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -L /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -Wl,-rpath,/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c -o /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp -latomic && env TSAN_OPTIONS='ignore_noninstrumented_modules=0:ignore_noninstrumented_modules=1' /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/deflake.bash /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp 2>&1 | tee /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp.log | /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/FileCheck /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c
# executed command: /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/clang -fopenmp -gdwarf-4 -O1 -fsanitize=thread -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -L /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -Wl,-rpath,/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c -o /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp -latomic
# .---command stderr------------
# | /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/../lib/clang/21/lib/ppc64le-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.tsan.a: No such file or directory
# | clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1
--
]: [The test "libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c" ended with result: "FAILED". This shows the output that was gathered for the test execution. It might contain insights into why the test "libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c" had an unexpected outcome.]
|
Issue: At least one test had an unexpected outcome.
Resolution: Here is list of some ways to fix an unexpected test result:
a) Find out the reason why the test fails and fix it. Should that not work, follow any of the following options.
b) If you've found out that your test is flaky, perhaps you can allow it to run more than once (see https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html#cmdoption-lit-max-retries-per-test).
c) If you need to mark your test to expectedly fail, you can set the LIT_XFAIL environment variable (see https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html#cmdoption-lit-xfail).
d) Should none of the above tips work, filter out the test by using the LIT_FILTER_OUT environment variable (see. https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html#cmdoption-lit-filter-out).
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
******************** TEST 'libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 13
/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/clang -fopenmp -gdwarf-4 -O1 -fsanitize=thread -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -L /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -Wl,-rpath,/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c -o /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp -latomic && env TSAN_OPTIONS='ignore_noninstrumented_modules=0:ignore_noninstrumented_modules=1' /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/deflake.bash /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp 2>&1 | tee /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp.log | /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/FileCheck /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c
# executed command: /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/./bin/clang -fopenmp -gdwarf-4 -O1 -fsanitize=thread -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests -I /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -L /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -Wl,-rpath,/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/task-taskwait-nested.c -o /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/tools/archer/tests/races/Output/task-taskwait-nested.c.tmp -latomic
# .---command stderr------------
# | /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-0ff95c9eb1e3b0785724d3e33df1e1f77f2c7473/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/../lib/clang/21/lib/ppc64le-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.tsan.a: No such file or directory
# | clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1
--
|
The test "libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c" ended with result: "FAILED". This shows the output that was gathered for the test execution. It might contain insights into why the test "libarcher :: races/task-taskwait-nested.c" had an unexpected outcome.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-hbejbezy/podman/podman.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 28 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M b69abec0d8344b1bb43241e024e31b9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1715332529.126011/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1ulmbs34:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release-eln findutils gawk glibc-minimal-langpack grep gzip info patch redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip util-linux which xz --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory]: [```
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-hbejbezy/podman/podman.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 28 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M b69abec0d8344b1bb43241e024e31b9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1715332529.126011/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1ulmbs34:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release-eln findutils gawk glibc-minimal-langpack grep gzip info patch redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip util-linux which xz --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
```]
|
Issue: Build failed because the buildroot is expecting /usr/bin/dnf-3
Resolution: Don't know yet. I have reported it to the ELN matrix room.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-hbejbezy/podman/podman.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 28 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M b69abec0d8344b1bb43241e024e31b9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1715332529.126011/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1ulmbs34:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release-eln findutils gawk glibc-minimal-langpack grep gzip info patch redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip util-linux which xz --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
|
```
Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
ERROR: Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-hbejbezy/podman/podman.spec) Config(fedora-eln-x86_64) 0 minutes 28 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M b69abec0d8344b1bb43241e024e31b9b -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-bootstrap-1715332529.126011/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240 --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.1ulmbs34:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-eln-x86_64-1715332529.126011/root/ --releasever eln --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release-eln findutils gawk glibc-minimal-langpack grep gzip info patch redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip util-linux which xz --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
execv(/usr/bin/dnf-3) failed: No such file or directory
```
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
pyproject_save_files: invalid option -- ']: [Option 'l' isn't valid.]
=============
[
error: /builddir/build/originals/python-hatchling.spec: line 49: Unknown option l in pyproject_save_files]: [Spec file contains error on line 49 in pyproject_save_files()]
|
Issue: Spec file or other build file contains errors.
Resolution: Inspect 'pyproject_save_files' and invalid option 'l'.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
pyproject_save_files: invalid option -- '
|
Option 'l' isn't valid.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: /builddir/build/originals/python-hatchling.spec: line 49: Unknown option l in pyproject_save_files
|
Spec file contains error on line 49 in pyproject_save_files()
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[
meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file.
]: [This is the actual error.]
|
Issue: A git snapshot tarball (such as those automatically generated by the popular git forges) was used as the sources, but the git repository from which it was taken contains git submodules. The content of git submodules are not included in such snapshot tarballs, but the build system expects them to be present, and hence the build fails.
Resolution: git submodules are usually used for bundled dependencies. If a system version of the dependency can be used instead, it may be preferred to do so, by adding the respective build dependency to the build. If not, then a complete tarball which includes the contents of the git submodules must be used. This may be available from upstream as a download, or it may need to be manually generated by the following steps:
1) `git clone REPOSITORY_URL`
2) `cd DIRECTORY`
3) `git submodule update --init`
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
meson.build:91:19: ERROR: Subproject exists but has no meson.build file.
|
This is the actual error.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
]: [reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available]
=============
[error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)]: [denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself]
|
Issue: One of the dependencies requires a newer version of Go than is available
Resolution: Package newer version of Go, or try building older version of the package that doesn't require newer Go
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
go: cloud.google.com/go/compute in vendor/modules.txt requires go >= 1.23.0 (running go 1.22.9; GOTOOLCHAIN=local)
|
reason why the build failed, specifically a dependency requires newer version of Go than is available
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9Ha4mi (%build)
|
denotes phase of the RPM build which failed; the %build phase itself
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3
checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed
]: [configure error caused build to fail]
|
Issue: Invalid value used for configure option --enable-debug-info
Resolution: Check configure --help for valid values to specified option
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=avr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3
checking build system type... Invalid configuration 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3': more than four components
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-pc-linux-gnu--enable-debug-info=ggdb3 failed
|
configure error caused build to fail
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ ββ Failed tests ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
ββ Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone βββββββ
... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE]: [Testsuite result with failed test output]
|
Issue: Failed test
Resolution: This tests works with timezone - verify that the tzdata package is installed, or identify the specific part of the code it is testing
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ββ Failed tests ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
ββ Failure ('test-timezone.R:7:5'): with_timezone: changes the time zone βββββββ
... %in% c("PDT", "PST") is not TRUE
|
Testsuite result with failed test output
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides python3.13dist(requests) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(filelock) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(munch) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(requests-toolbelt) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
]: [Dnf apparently fails to install build dependencies.]
=============
[nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base]: [python3-copr dep from copr_base repo (from copr, not from the base repo) depends on `python3.13dist(setuptools)`]
|
Issue: It is bad as we can not find it in logs, but Fedora Rawhide switched against Python 3.14, and rebuild all the provided packages.
The Copr repository `copr_base` though still contains packages built against Python 3.13, and these can not be installed together with Python 3.14 runtime. Hence this failure.
Resolution: The packages in Copr (fedora rawhide chroots) need to be rebuilt against the new Fedora Rawhide Python runtime 3.14 first. Example python3-copr-common and python3-copr.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides python3.13dist(requests) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(filelock) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(munch) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python3.13dist(requests-toolbelt) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
- nothing provides python(abi) = 3.13 needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
|
Dnf apparently fails to install build dependencies.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
nothing provides python3.13dist(setuptools) needed by python3-copr-2.1.post1-1.git.8160.3a5543a.fc43.noarch from copr_base
|
python3-copr dep from copr_base repo (from copr, not from the base repo) depends on `python3.13dist(setuptools)`
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Handling poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1
Handling setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend]: [poetry-core and setupttols_rust are not present in required versions.]
|
Issue: Requirement for building a package are not satisfied.
Resolution: Provide poetry-core and setuptools_rust in required versions.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Handling poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: poetry-core>=1.1.0,<=1.9.1
Handling setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2 from build-system.requires
Requirement not satisfied: setuptools_rust>=1.3,<=1.10.2
Exiting dependency generation pass: build backend
|
poetry-core and setupttols_rust are not present in required versions.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ !! Copr timeout => sending INT
WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing...
Copr build error: Build failed]: [This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.]
|
Issue: Copr killed this build because it reached the timeout level. Builds are not allowed to run forever. The default limit is 5 hours (18000 seconds) but users can increase it up to 30 hours (108000 seconds).
Resolution: When you are submitting a new build you can specify the Timeout. The option is available both in WebUI and CLI (--timeout) and is specified in seconds.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
!! Copr timeout => sending INT
WARNING: Machine a97e46b4dd5e489ba0437eef36214d35 still running. Killing...
Copr build error: Build failed
|
This is an information from Copr buildsystem that this build is taking too long and reach the timeout level.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign !! Copr timeout => sending INT]: [Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.]
|
Issue: The Copr build reached its timeout because of a stuck test case thus the build was terminated and labeled as failed.
Resolution: Fix the test case.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign !! Copr timeout => sending INT
|
Test named `tests/test_background_worker_build.py::test_full_rpm_build_no_sign` in pytest run for too long and because of that the Copr build reached its build timeout thus Copr terminated this build as failed.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[error: invalid command 'test']: [Error message]
|
Issue: setup.py test was deprecated and removed.
Resolution: Use supported test invocation. E.g. add BuildRequires: python3-pytest and use %pytest in
%check section of SPEC file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
error: invalid command 'test'
|
Error message
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.]
=============
[ File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).]: [The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.]
|
Issue: There was a breaking change in Sphinx 8.2.x. The projects need to update their codebase.
Resolution: In conf.py should be
intersphinx_mapping = {'python': ("https://docs.python.org/3/": None)}
instead of
intersphinx_mapping = {"https://docs.python.org/3/": None}
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
ERROR: Invalid value `None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tuple or list.
|
The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
File "/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/sphinx/ext/intersphinx/_load.py", line 132, in validate_intersphinx_mapping
raise ConfigError(msg)
sphinx.errors.ConfigError: Invalid `intersphinx_mapping` configuration (1 error).
|
The snippet show error in the sphinx configuration file.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[Start: buildsrpm
Start: rpmbuild -bs
error: line 12: Unknown tag: %bcond check 1]: [EL8 doesn't know about the %bcond macro]
|
Issue: EL8 doesn't know about %bcond macro that is used in the spec to evaluate conditional values / params.
Resolution: Don't use %bcond macro in EL8 builds
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
Start: buildsrpm
Start: rpmbuild -bs
error: line 12: Unknown tag: %bcond check 1
|
EL8 doesn't know about the %bcond macro
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources
self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation(
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation
SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__
self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir
return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path
raise FileNotFoundError(
FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.]: [Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.]
|
Issue: Packit in Copr build, specifically in creating SRPM failed, the key issue was that Packit was told to look for specfile under cli/vercajk.spec path but no specfile was found under that path.
Resolution: Specify in .packit.yaml file the right path where the specfile is.
|
Analyse following RPM build log snippet. Describe contents accurately, without speculation or suggestions for resolution.
Your analysis must be as concise as possible, while keeping relevant information intact.
Snippet:
2024-02-03 20:04:31.993 utils.py ERROR Preparation of the repository for creation of an SRPM failed: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/api.py", line 1592, in prepare_sources
self.up.prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation(
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 638, in prepare_upstream_for_srpm_creation
SRPMBuilder(upstream=self, ref=upstream_ref).prepare(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/upstream.py", line 975, in __init__
self.rpmbuild_dir = self.upstream.absolute_specfile_dir
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 99, in absolute_specfile_dir
return self.absolute_specfile_path.parent
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/packit/base_git.py", line 111, in absolute_specfile_path
raise FileNotFoundError(
FileNotFoundError: Specfile /tmp/tmplmauts6y/cli/vercajk.spec not found on ref pr/4.
|
Packit tried to prepare repository and find a specfile under /cli/*.spec path. This snippet show error that tells no such specfile under cli/vercajk.spec exists.
|
Given following log snippets, their explanation, and nothing else, explain what failure, if any, occurred during build of this package.
Snippets are in a format of [X] : [Y], where [X] is a log snippet, and [Y] is the explanation.
Snippets are delimited with '================'.
Drawing on information from all snippets, provide a concise explanation of the issue and recommend a solution.
Explanation of the issue, and recommended solution, should take a handful of sentences.
Snippets:
[make: pg_config: Command not found
make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.]: [The pg_config file was not found and the makefile being called during the make process does not contain the install rule itself]
|
Issue: The pg_config file was not found, it is either named incorrectly, not in the expected place missing or not passed to the call of make install correctly.
Resolution: Ensure the pg_config file is located in the expected directory, is named correctly and if needed is passed to the %make_install macro correctly.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.